Best Practices for Data Modeling: Methods for Creating Flexible Schemas that Improve Accessibility and Productivity
Keywords:
Data Modeling, Schema Design, Data Partitioning, MicroservicesAbstract
Creating systems that works effectively & are simple to maintain requires effective data modeling. The best techniques for creating flexible schemas that satisfy present requirements & foster the future expansion and are the main emphasis of this tutorial. It emphasizes how well-structured data facilitates the effective searches, adjusts to changing business needs, & eases the transfers as data landscapes grow, with a focus on scalabilities, flexibility & the performance. Important methods for striking a balance between the data integrity & the performances are covers, including normalization, denormalization & hybrid approaches. Schema designs that facilitates the data accesses, increase usability & guarantees end-user clarity are also covered. In order to promote high-performing applications & improves decision-making, strategies for preserving data consistency, improving indexes & manages connections between data items are investigated. This paper offers helpful advices for developing the schemas that can be adapt, increases productivity & simplifies data operations via examples & the case studies. Database administrators, architects & the data modelers will be discover practical guidance for creating a strong and flexible data models that adapt to evolving business requirements and technological advancements.
References
1. Muller, R. J. (1999). Database design for smarties: using UML for data modeling. Morgan Kaufmann.
2. Corr, L., & Stagnitto, J. (2011). Agile data warehouse design: Collaborative dimensional modeling, from whiteboard to star schema. Decision One Consulting.
3. Zicari, R. (1991, January). A framework for schema updates in an object-oriented
database system. In Proceedings. Seventh International Conference on Data Engineering (pp. 2-3). IEEE Computer Society.
4. Ram, S., & Ramesh, V. (1998). Collaborative conceptual schema design: a process model and prototype system. ACM Transactions on Information Systems(TOIS), 16(4), 347-371.
5. Kleppmann, M. (2017). Designing data-intensive applications: The big ideas behind reliable, scalable, and maintainable systems. " O'Reilly Media, Inc.".
6. Adamson, C. (2012). Mastering data warehouse aggregates: solutions for star schema performance. John Wiley & Sons.
7. Batra, D. (2007). Cognitive complexity in data modeling: causes and recommendations. Requirements Engineering, 12, 231-244.
8. Mior, M. J., Salem, K., Aboulnaga, A., & Liu, R. (2017). NoSE: Schema design for NoSQL applications. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 29(10), 2275-2289.
9. Heer, J., & Agrawala, M. (2006). Software design patterns for information visualization. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, 12(5), 853-860.
10. Ballard, C., Herreman, D., Schau, D., Bell, R., Kim, E., & Valencic, A. (1998). Data modeling techniques for data warehousing (p. 25). San Jose: IBM Corporation International Technical Support Organization.
11. Angrish, A., Starly, B., Lee, Y. S., & Cohen, P. H. (2017). A flexible data schema and system architecture for the virtualization of manufacturing machines (VMM). Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 45, 236-247.
12. Qian, L., LeFevre, K., & Jagadish, H. V. (2010). CRIUS: user-friendly database design. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 4(2), 81-92.
13. Nadkarni, P. M. (2011). Metadata-driven software systems in biomedicine: designing systems that can adapt to changing knowledge. Springer Science & Business Media.
14. Ambler, S. W., & Sadalage, P. J. (2006). Refactoring databases: Evolutionary database design. Pearson Education.
15. Curino, C., Moon, H. J., & Zaniolo, C. (2009, October). Automating database schema evolution in information system upgrades. In Proceedings of the 2ndInternational Workshop on Hot Topics in Software Upgrades (pp. 1-5).
16. Gade, K. R. (2018). Real-Time Analytics: Challenges and Opportunities. Innovative Computer Sciences Journal, 4(1).
17. Gade, K. R. (2017). Integrations: ETL vs. ELT: Comparative analysis and best practices. Innovative Computer Sciences Journal, 3(1).
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.