Data as a Product: The Decentralization of Data Architectures through Data Mesh
Keywords:
Data ownership, data silos, cross-functional teams, data interoperabilityAbstract
Data Mesh marks a radical transformation in data architecture by means of decentralization and envisioning data as a product, therefore overcoming the limitations of centralized data management. Conventional data solutions, such as lakes and centralized data warehouses, often struggle with scalability, agility, and meeting the several needs of modern businesses.
Adopting a Data Mesh design presents difficulties including cultural change, the need for specialist knowledge, and the supervision of the technical details related with distributed systems. Notwithstanding these obstacles, Data Mesh provides a strong structure for companies to meet the needs of a fast changing data environment, therefore promoting faster innovation and improved decision-making. Data Mesh enhances data through the decentralization of ownership and the implementation of a product-oriented approach, so empowering organizations to excel in a data-driven landscape and promoting enhanced collaboration and innovation across several domains.
The federation of principles controls this decentralization by reconciling autonomy with adherence to enterprise-wide standards, therefore ensuring data consistency, security, and compliance. The result is a scalable, agile, democratized data ecosystem that lets businesses derive more quickly and effectively actionable insights.
References
1. Wang, C., & Jiang, P. (2015, June). The approach of hybrid data on tag in decentralized control system. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Cyber Technology in Automation, Control, and Intelligent Systems (CYBER) (pp. 799-802). IEEE.
2. Burdeniuk, A. (2014). A mesh architecture for data management of matrix computations (Doctoral dissertation).
3. De Filippi, P. (2015). Community mesh networks: citizens' participation in the deployment of smart cities. In Handbook of research on social, economic, and environmental sustainability in the development of smart cities (pp. 298-314). IGI Global.
4. Raoult, B., Aubert, G., Gutiérrez, M., Arciniegas-Lopez, C., & Correa, R. (2009). Virtual organisation in the SIMDAT meteorological activity: a decentralised access control mechanism for distributed data. Earth science informatics, 2, 63-74.
5. Trieb, R., Ballester, A., Kartsounis, G., Alemany, S., Uriel, J., Hansen, G., ... & Vangenabith, M. (2013, November). EUROFIT—integration, homogenisation and extension of the scope of large 3D anthropometric data pools for product development. In 4th International conference and exhibition on 3D body scanning technologies, Long Beach, CA, USA (pp. 19-20).
6. Raval, S. (2016). Decentralized applications: harnessing Bitcoin's blockchain technology. " O'Reilly Media, Inc.".
7. Wheeler, A., & Auburn, C. B. (2003). Wireless mesh networks: better connectivity: to ensure reliability in industrial applications, a wireless data-transmission network must be'self-organizing'and'self-healing.'(eBusiness for the Chemical Process Industries). Chemical Engineering, 110(5), 73-78.
8. Khatri, V. (2016). Managerial work in the realm of the digital universe: The role of the data triad. Business Horizons, 59(6), 673-688.
9. Nagel, B., Böhnke, D., Gollnick, V., Schmollgruber, P., Rizzi, A., La Rocca, G., & Alonso, J. J. (2012, September). Communication in aircraft design: Can we establish a common language. In 28th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences (Vol. 201, No. 2).
10. Duncan, R. (1990). A survey of parallel computer architectures. Computer, 23(2), 5-16.
11. Ahlbrandt, J., Brammen, D., Majeed, R. W., Lefering, R., Semler, S. C., Thun, S., ... & Röhrig, R. (2014). Balancing the need for big data and patient data privacy–an IT infrastructure for a decentralized emergency care research database. In e-Health–For Continuity of Care (pp. 750-754). IOS Press.
12. Stolpe, M. (2016). The internet of things: Opportunities and challenges for distributed data analysis. Acm Sigkdd Explorations Newsletter, 18(1), 15-34.
13. Lyko, K., Nitzschke, M., & Ngonga Ngomo, A. C. (2016). Big data acquisition. New horizons for a data-driven economy: a roadmap for usage and exploitation of big data in Europe, 39-61.
14. Shang, W., Bannis, A., Liang, T., Wang, Z., Yu, Y., Afanasyev, A., ... & Zhang, L. (2016, April). Named data networking of things. In 2016 IEEE first international conference on internet-of-things design and implementation (IoTDI) (pp. 117-128). IEEE.
15. Bonifati, A., Chrysanthis, P. K., Ouksel, A. M., & Sattler, K. U. (2008). Distributed databases and peer-to-peer databases: past and present. ACM SIGMOD Record, 37(1), 5-11.
16. Gade, K. R. (2019). Data Migration Strategies for Large-Scale Projects in the Cloud for Fintech. Innovative Computer Sciences Journal, 5(1).
17. Gade, K. R. (2018). Real-Time Analytics: Challenges and Opportunities. Innovative Computer Sciences Journal, 4(1).
18. Komandla, V. Enhancing Security and Fraud Prevention in Fintech: Comprehensive Strategies for Secure Online Account Opening.
19. Komandla, V. Transforming Financial Interactions: Best Practices for Mobile Banking App Design and Functionality to Boost User Engagement and Satisfaction.
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
