Apache Iceberg: An Innovative Table Format for Data Lake Management
Keywords:
Apache Iceberg, data lakes, big data analytics, HiveAbstract
Apache Iceberg uses a creative table structure to tackle challenges with massive data lakes. Data lakes are beset with problems including standards, scalability, and performance.
Conventional data lake management system analytical workload dependability and performance may be affected by schema change, partitioning inefficiencies, and atomic operations. Apache Iceberg addresses data lake access, storage, and processing.
By integrating readily to current data ecosystems, iceberg handles vast data volumes and improves data lake performance. Apache Iceberg makes data lakes scalable and efficient by fixing performance optimization, schema changes, and data integrity. Big data and complex process companies want it.
Through ACID transactions, schema evolution, and partitioning optimization, multi-tenant systems preserve data integrity. For complex analytics and lowest overhead large-scale administration, this tabular form guarantees consistent data.
For difficult searches, large data processing, and dynamic workloads, iceberg scales, performs, and adapts better than Hive. Iceberg changes data lake administration by enhancing partition creation and controlling large quantities without performance issues. For big data and analytics, Iceberg preserves data lake performance, dependability, and administration thus enabling businesses to grow free from constrained solutions.
References
1. Ghavami, P. (2016). Big Data Governance: Modern Data Management Principles for Hadoop, NoSQL & Big Data Analytics. Washington, DC.
2. Shashish, M. (2011). Matching raster and trajectory data using web services (Master's thesis, University of Twente).
3. Cielen, D., & Meysman, A. (2016). Introducing data science: big data, machine learning, and more, using Python tools. Simon and Schuster.
4. Mitchell, T. (2005). Web mapping illustrated: using open source GIS toolkits. " O'Reilly Media, Inc.".
5. Davenport, T. H., & Dyché, J. (2013). Big data in big companies. International Institute for Analytics, 3(1-31).
6. Brittliff, N. (2014). The'schema-last'Approach: Data Analytics and the Intelligence Life-cycle (Doctoral dissertation, University of Canberra).
7. Wernecke, J. (2008). The KML handbook: geographic visualization for the Web. Pearson Education.
8. Xiong, C. (2010). Developing a web-based sea ice information system using GIS (Doctoral dissertation, Toronto Metropolitan University).
9. Yu, P. (2013). Challenges and solutions for COSL's operation in the Arctic (Master's thesis, University of Stavanger, Norway).
10. Pope, D. (2017). Big data analytics with SAS: Get actionable insights from your big data using the power of SAS. Packt Publishing Ltd.
11. Rosenberg, S. (2008). Dreaming in code: Two dozen programmers, three years, 4,732 bugs, and one quest for transcendent software. Crown Currency.
12. Stuart, D. (2011). Facilitating access to the web of data: A guide for librarians. Facet Publishing.
13. Eisenstein, D. J., Weinberg, D. H., Agol, E., Aihara, H., Prieto, C. A., Anderson, S. F., ... & Ogando, R. L. (2011). Sdss-iii: Massive spectroscopic surveys of the distant universe, the milky way, and extra-solar planetary systems. The Astronomical Journal, 142(3), 72.
14. Lake, A. (2000). 6 nightmares: real threats in a dangerous world and how America can meet them. Hachette UK.
15. Landres, P. B. (2000). National wilderness preservation system database: Key attributes and trends, 1964 through 1999. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.
16. Gade, K. R. (2017). Integrations: ETL vs. ELT: Comparative analysis and best practices. Innovative Computer Sciences Journal, 3(1).
17. Gade, K. R. (2017). Migrations: Challenges and Best Practices for Migrating Legacy Systems to Cloud-Based Platforms. Innovative Computer Sciences Journal, 3(1).
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.