Implementing Data Mesh: The Decentralization of Data Ownership in Organizations
Keywords:
Data Mesh, Decentralized Data Ownership, Data as a Product, Self-Serve InfrastructureAbstract
Data Mesh is a fresh approach in data architecture meant to decentralize data ownership and conceptualize data as a product, therefore addressing the limits of centralized systems. Unlike traditional data platforms that often run across scaling problems, Data Mesh supports a change in organizational data management and usage so that domain-specific teams may take whole responsibility for the data they produce. This approach supports domain-driven architecture, in which cross-functional teams understanding the unique needs of their business unit own and manage data, therefore enabling a more flexible and scalable data ecosystem. Data Mesh's basic principles—decentralized ownership, self-service infrastructure, and a product-centric approach to data—allow companies to effectively improve data operations while ensuring that high-quality data remains easily available to stakeholders. Using Data Mesh calls for both significant cultural changes in companies and technical changes. Implementing Data Mesh presents a main challenge for companies since this new approach requires teams to adopt new paradigms on data use and conceptualization, thereby overcoming resistance to change. The successful application of Data Mesh by different companies is investigated in this paper together with real-world case studies showing the related advantages and constraints of its acceptance. Decentralizing data ownership helps companies to improve collaboration, solve data access issues, and therefore foster a closer alignment between data and business goals.
Turning to a Data Mesh paradigm presents problems. Businesses have to rebuild data governance and security policies, equip teams to operate in this new dispersed paradigm, and supply tools fit for the relevant technologies and infrastructure. The move to Data Mesh increases data flexibility and creativity even if it requires careful planning and a readiness to welcome cultural transformation. This paper offers pragmatic advice for companies switching from conventional, centralized data systems to a distributed Data Mesh architecture together with ideas on the methodology, tools, and practices that can facilitate efficient implementation.
References
1. Esposito, C. (2018). Interoperable, dynamic and privacy-preserving access control for cloud data storage when integrating heterogeneous organizations. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 108, 124-136.
2. Pala, S. K. (2017). Advance Analytics for Reporting and Creating Dashboards with Tools like SSIS, Visual Analytics and Tableau.
3. Kostić, D., Rodriguez, A., Albrecht, J., & Vahdat, A. (2003, October). Bullet: High bandwidth data dissemination using an overlay mesh. In Proceedings of the nineteenth ACM symposium on Operating systems principles (pp. 282-297).
4. Raval, S. (2016). Decentralized applications: harnessing Bitcoin's blockchain technology. " O'Reilly Media, Inc.".
5. Wright, A., & De Filippi, P. (2015). Decentralized blockchain technology and the rise of lex cryptographia. Available at SSRN 2580664.
6. Casino, F., Dasaklis, T. K., & Patsakis, C. (2019). A systematic literature review of blockchain-based applications: Current status, classification and open issues. Telematics and informatics, 36, 55-81.
7. Ruj, S., Stojmenovic, M., & Nayak, A. (2013). Decentralized access control with anonymous authentication of data stored in clouds. IEEE transactions on parallel and distributed systems, 25(2), 384-394.
8. Kshetri, N. (2017). Blockchain's roles in strengthening cybersecurity and protecting privacy. Telecommunications policy, 41(10), 1027-1038.
9. Demchenko, Y., Cushing, R., Los, W., Grosso, P., de Laat, C., & Gommans, L. (2019, July). Open data market architecture and functional components. In 2019 International Conference on High Performance Computing & Simulation (HPCS) (pp. 1017-1021). IEEE.
10. Naraine, M. L. (2019). The blockchain phenomenon: Conceptualizing decentralized networks and the value proposition to the sport industry. International Journal of Sport Communication, 12(3), 313-335.
11. Mougayar, W. (2016). The business blockchain: promise, practice, and application of the next Internet technology. John Wiley & Sons.
12. Kleppmann, M., Wiggins, A., Van Hardenberg, P., & McGranaghan, M. (2019, October). Local-first software: you own your data, in spite of the cloud. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM SIGPLAN International Symposium on New Ideas, New Paradigms, and Reflections on Programming and Software (pp. 154-178).
13. Hitt, L. M., & Brynjolfsson, E. (1997). Information technology and internal firm organization: An exploratory analysis. Journal of management information systems, 14(2), 81-101.
14. Raman, A., Joglekar, S., Cristofaro, E. D., Sastry, N., & Tyson, G. (2019, October). Challenges in the decentralised web: The mastodon case. In Proceedings of the internet measurement conference (pp. 217-229).
15. Asharaf, S., & Adarsh, S. (Eds.). (2017). Decentralized computing using blockchain technologies and smart contracts: Emerging research and opportunities: Emerging research and opportunities.
16. Gade, K. R. (2017). Integrations: ETL vs. ELT: Comparative analysis and best practices. Innovative Computer Sciences Journal, 3(1).
17. Gade, K. R. (2019). Data Migration Strategies for Large-Scale Projects in the Cloud for Fintech. Innovative Computer Sciences Journal, 5(1).
18. Gade, K. R. (2018). Real-Time Analytics: Challenges and Opportunities. Innovative Computer Sciences Journal, 4(1).
19. Komandla, V. Enhancing Security and Fraud Prevention in Fintech: Comprehensive Strategies for Secure Online Account Opening.
20. Komandla, V. Transforming Financial Interactions: Best Practices for Mobile Banking App Design and Functionality to Boost User Engagement and Satisfaction.
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
