Revenue Recognition Evolution Under ASC 606: Learnings Made and Industry-Specific Difficulties
Keywords:
ASC 606, revenue recognition, accounting standards, financial reportingAbstract
Adoption of ASC 606, the revenue recognition standard set by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), has fundamentally changed the way companies in all spheres record and handle income. Aiming at increasing openness and comparability in financial reporting, ASC 606 replaces industry-specific rules with a comprehensive, principles-driven framework. Organizations have had several challenges since their founding, particularly in sectors defined by complex client contracts including technology, telecommunications, and life sciences. These issues cover identifying performance obligations, setting transaction fees, and sharing income across several deliverables. Early adopters provide insights that highlight the need of cooperation among finance, operations, and IT teams to ensure exact and consistent application.
Organizations undergoing this change must implement robust data systems, enhance interdepartmental communication, and participate in continuous training to meet regulatory requirements and ensure compliance. The revenue recognition system is being revised in accordance with ASC 606, compelling firms to scrutinize and improve their practices to achieve more accuracy and transparency in financial reporting. Analyzing the issues faced and the solutions implemented enables firms to comprehend the standards' criteria and prepare for impending changes in financial reporting.
References
1. Chandra, U., Dutta, S. K., & Marcinko, D. J. (2018). Revenue recognition at TSA, Inc.—A roller coaster ride. Issues in Accounting Education, 33(3), 101-116.
2. GAAP, U. (2018). Revenue recognition.
3. Vandenberghe, D., Kitchen, P., Adkisson, J., & Pinkstaff, K. (2017). Changes to revenue recognition in the healthcare industry. Retrieved on April, 2, 2018.
4. James, M. L. (2016). REVENUE RECOGNITION AT INGELHEIM SUSTAINABILITY CONSULTANTS-A CASE EXPLORING THE EFFECT OF THE NEW CONVERGED STANDARD. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 22(2), 76.
5. Flood, J. M. (2017). Wiley Revenue Recognition,+ Website: Understanding and Implementing the New Standard. John Wiley & Sons.
6. Du, N., Alford, R. M., & Smith, P. L. (2016). Do GAAP And IFRS Differ In Collectiblity Judgments Related To Revenue Recognition?. Journal of Applied Business Research, 32(6), 1675.
7. HANDBOOK, C. (2008). Governance, risk, and compliance handbook.
8. Hall, J. A. (2011). Accounting information systems. South-Western Cengage Learning.
9. Singh, S. (2015). Assessing the Concerns of the Telecommunications Industry Regarding Revenue Recognition. University of Johannesburg (South Africa).
10. White, G. I., Sondhi, A. C., & Fried, D. (2002). The analysis and use of financial statements. John Wiley & Sons.
11. Chiwamit, P., Modell, S., & Yang, C. L. (2014). The societal relevance of management accounting innovations: economic value added and institutional work in the fields of Chinese and Thai state-owned enterprises. Accounting and Business Research, 44(2), 144-180.
12. Koenigsfeld, J. P. (2007). Developing an industry specific managerial competency model for private club managers in the United States based on important and frequently used management competencies. Auburn University.
13. Guides, I. (2014). Gaming, September 1, 2014: Audit and Accounting Guide.
14. Arms, D., & Bercik, T. (2015). Preparing for ASC 606: how to use change management to your advantage. Strategic Finance, 97(5), 34-41.
15. Nelson, N. (2015). FASB Proposed ASU, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) Narrow Scope Improvements and P.
16. Gade, K. R. (2017). Integrations: ETL/ELT, Data Integration Challenges, Integration Patterns. Innovative Computer Sciences Journal, 3(1).
17. Gade, K. R. (2017). Migrations: Challenges and Best Practices for Migrating Legacy Systems to Cloud-Based Platforms. Innovative Computer Sciences Journal, 3(1).
18. Komandla, V. Transforming Financial Interactions: Best Practices for Mobile Banking App Design and Functionality to Boost User Engagement and Satisfaction.
19. Naresh Dulam. The Shift to Cloud-Native Data Analytics: AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud Discussing the Growing Trend of Cloud-Native Big Data Processing Solutions. Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research, vol. 1, Feb. 2015, pp. 28-48
20. Naresh Dulam. DataOps: Streamlining Data Management for Big Data and Analytics . Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research, vol. 2, Oct. 2016, pp. 28-50
21. Naresh Dulam. Machine Learning on Kubernetes: Scaling AI Workloads . Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research, vol. 2, Sept. 2016, pp. 50-70
22. Naresh Dulam. Data Lakes Vs Data Warehouses: What’s Right for Your Business?. Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research, vol. 2, Nov. 2016, pp. 71-94
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
